Are the particles that make up thoughts in our brain not also a representation of a thought? Isn't "thought" really some kind of Platonic ideal that only has approximate material representations? If so, why couldn't some language sentences be thoughts?

▲

qlm a day ago | parent [-]

The sentence is the result of a thought. The sentence in itself does not capture every process that went into producing the sentence.

	▲	naasking 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> The sentence in itself does not capture every process that went into producing the sentence. A thought does not capture every process that went into producing the thought either.