| ▲ | segmondy 2 days ago |
| AGI is already here. |
|
| ▲ | 010101010101 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Where are you because it’s sure not where I am… |
| |
| ▲ | segmondy a day ago | parent [-] | | 5 years ago, everyone would agree that what we have today is AGI. | | |
| ▲ | zeknife a day ago | parent | next [-] | | At least until they spend some time with it | |
| ▲ | baobun a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 100 years ago, "everyone" would similarly agree that what we had 10 years ago was either literally God or The Devil. | |
| ▲ | rvz a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | No-one agrees on what is even AGI, except for the fact that the definitions change more times that the weather which makes it meaningless. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | password54321 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| AI psychosis is already here. |
|
| ▲ | chronci739 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > AGI is already here. cause elon musk says FSD is coming in 2017? |
| |
| ▲ | adastra22 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Because we already have artificial (man-made) general (contrast with domain specific) intelligence (algorithmic problem solvers). A.G.I. If ChatGPT is not AGI, somebody has moved goalposts. | | |
| ▲ | 010101010101 a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Both "general" and "intelligence" are _at least_ easily arguable without moving any goal posts, not that goal posts have ever been well established in the first place. | |
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | walkabout 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think a baseline requirement would be that it… thinks. That’s not a thing LLMs do. | | |
| ▲ | adastra22 a day ago | parent [-] | | That’s an odd claim, given that we have so-called thinking models. Is there a specific way you have in mind in which LLMs are not thinking processes? | | |
|
|
|
