▲ | HPsquared 2 days ago | |||||||
They want to block things, but don't want the optics of being one of "those" countries with a national firewall. So we get things like this. | ||||||||
▲ | Levitz 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
That part I understand, it surely looks awful. The ID side of things though? Having your citizenry send their personal information to foreign companies all across the globe? It's a disaster waiting to happen. | ||||||||
▲ | thewebguyd 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
That's what it seems like. Instead of getting court orders and ordering ISPs to block the sites, the UK is pushing off the responsibility for age verification onto the companies/site owners whether they are actually under UK jurisdiction or not. Because if instead the UK just managed it internally, and started ordering ISPs to block, they'd be criticized foor being like China, and the citizens would start placing their blame on the government instead of the private companies that are pulling out of the market. | ||||||||
▲ | RobotToaster a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
We already have hadrian's firewall blocking some piracy sites. | ||||||||
▲ | rpcope1 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Given the constant stream of crazy things I read about the UK, I'm surprised that a national firewall is off the table given their laws and attitudes around what would be protected speech here. | ||||||||
|