▲ | 01HNNWZ0MV43FF 9 hours ago | |
MicroPython's a bytecode interpreter so, other than the existing Python ecosystem being a huge boon (popularity being a form of strength), you could get many of the same benefits and more from wasm | ||
▲ | pjmlp 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
If we forget about the pain that most WASM toolchains happen to be. MicroPython, like most BASIC interpreters in 8 bit days, also allows for inline Assembly. As for running bytecode on MCU that is as old as MCU themselves, wasm doesn't bring anything to table. | ||
▲ | Rohansi 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
You can actually opt-in to native compilation on a function level so it's not just a bytecode interpreter. You can also compile it yourself with additional functionality written in C/C++ and just use Python for the glue that isn't performance sensitive. |