▲ | kg 14 hours ago | |||||||||||||
> Moreover, type systems can track that a list was previously sorted and maintained it's sorted status making the assumption reasonable to state. This is true, but if you care about correct execution, you would need to re-verify that the list is sorted - bitflips in your DRAM or a buggy piece of code trampling random memory could have de-sorted the list. Then your formally verified application misbehaves even though nothing is wrong with it. It's also possible to end up with a "sorted" list that isn't actually sorted if your comparison function is buggy, though hopefully you formally verified the comparison function and it's correct. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | voxl 11 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
You already have hardware level bit flip verification, you don't need to recheck the list | ||||||||||||||
|