▲ | firesteelrain 15 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The 3D-PAWS project is interesting, but I don’t see the cost advantage. Commercial stations like the Ambient Weather WS-2902 are cheaper, last just as long, and already integrate with Weather Underground. What makes this design worth the extra expense? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | baby_souffle 15 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> What makes this design worth the extra expense? 3d printable means that parts are never out of stock and upgrades are relatively straight-forward to implement (assuming you have the cad/STEP files. modifying STL/Mesh files is a pain in the ass) Agree, though; for not that much $, you can get a pretty nice kit from Ali Express that'll spit out measurements over a serial port for use with APRS / LoRA or even just an arduino / raspbery pi ... etc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|