| ▲ | gusgus01 a day ago |
| In the DSM-5, they merged several conditions into one diagnosis called Autism Spectrum Disorder. At the same time, they defined ASD as having levels 1, 2, and 3. Those levels are defined by how much support the individual needs. Level 1 is "requiring support", level 2 is "requiring substantial support", and level 3 is "requiring very substantial support". Asperger's diagnosis would generally correspond with Level 1 ASD. That doesn't really help with the social side of describing it though. |
|
| ▲ | grayhatter a day ago | parent [-] |
| There's a small problem with the definition of "requires support", because growing up, I was smart enough, and good enough at masking, that I never "required support." Arguably, I still probably don't. But once I grew up, and started to look for ways to improve my mental health. My life very quickly shifted from, surviving ok-ish. To thriving and improving. So many people insist that it doesn't count unless you're completely or meaningfully incapacitated. But that's stupid place to put the bar. |
| |
| ▲ | jrowen a day ago | parent [-] | | I think it's because it did kind of used to mean that. It described people that couldn't mask, couldn't totally function in society, couldn't have the kind of job depicted in the Autism Simulator. It's been expanded officially and colloquially which may not have been the right direction with the terminology. I think the DSM and the approach of trying to follow and fit in with more concretely diagnosable medical conditions may be considered harmful and too rigid. For more mild and gray-area cases, it's really more akin to personality and it should be about understanding the particular combination of traits or symptoms of an individual. I wouldn't be officially diagnosed with OCD, or depression, or BPD, or maybe even ADD, but I can relate to all of those on some level and I feel like learning about them helps me understand myself better (with a grain of salt just like any health thing). It doesn't make me go around telling people I'm disabled and how they need to accommodate or support me, that's just narcissism. | | |
| ▲ | Dylan16807 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I think it's because it did kind of used to mean that. It described people that couldn't mask, couldn't totally function in society, couldn't have the kind of job depicted in the Autism Simulator. If you mean "Autism", that might be true. But I don't think "Asperger's" meant that. So we might have taken a step backwards there. |
|
|