▲ | genkoph 2 days ago | |
Hi, no worries, I understand your question. I thought that most of the use cases for such a library could be boiled down to a single function that can wrap throwable pieces of code and convert their result to a Result type and that's exactly what I implemented. I also wanted minimal amount of methods for the Result variant classes and delightful method names so I tried to do that and I'm happy with the results! (no pun intended) It's just a little side project, not much thought has been put inside of it except the core idea behind it that I just explained. |