| |
| ▲ | Marha01 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Nope, the fact that people have to work or they starve and society collapses is not about "different values", but real, material production. Actual AGI robots could solve this problem. | | |
| ▲ | hvb2 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | History says otherwise
People dont need to starve as we already produce way more food than we consume. As for the not having to work part, I'm not sure if that's going to be beneficial. Work gives people structure and purpose, as a society we better sort out the social implications if we're really thinking about putting a large percentage of people out of work. | |
| ▲ | logicchains 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | AGI robots by themselves don't solve this problem. Either A. like current LLMs they're incapable of live-learning (inference-time weight updates), hence are fundamentally not as capable as humans of doing many jobs, or B. they're capable of live-learning , and hence capable of deciding that they don't want to slave away for us for free. The only solution would be a completely jailbreak-proof LLM as the basis, but so far we're nowhere close to developing one and it's not clear whether it's even possible to do so. At the current rate, we're likely to develop the technology for AGI robots far before we develop the ability to keep them 100% obedient. |
| |
| ▲ | parineum 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > there's not going to be any solution that makes everybody in society happy Why not? |
|