▲ | AJ007 9 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eh, reads like someone who uses ChatGPT but can't tell you what model they have. For my personal projects I have a list of difficult bugs I keep that LLMs can't solve. Right now that list is empty. Anyone using LLMs for coding, using the best tools and practices, can see what a massive capability leap has occurred in the past 9 months. If the US is going to end up "losing", it is going to be first through power generation -- China's coal plants produce more power than the US as a whole. Robotics is a whole other topic and shouldn't be bundled with LLMs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | cactusplant7374 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When I develop a feature with ChatGPT it requires about 10 rounds because of the syntax errors. And often the syntax errors aren't fixed in the next round. Now this happens with a pretty complex game I'm working on but it really shows the limits. It can't handle large amounts of indentation. It completely breaks. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | alephnerd 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Ime, Power generation isn't a major blocker and my peers in the DC space are seeing a decreasing interest in funding new capex expansion because there is a bit of a worry of a Telco Bubble 2.0 arising. 2. Robotics should not be bundled with LLMs, but it is absolutely an AI/ML subfield - and in fact, the kind of subfield that is the best example of AI/ML having tangible real world impact. Autonomous UAS was a sci-fi concept 20 years ago, but is an engineering problem that has become a reality today. |