▲ | throwaway_7274 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indeed! It undeniably succeeded at setting the standard for typesetting quality. Big ups to Don K. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | analog31 5 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It also brought typesetting to academic research, which means it's doing something that wasn't necessary before it arrived. I was one of the last holdouts from a bygone era. I finished my dissertation in physics, in 1993. It's neither typeset, nor even in a computer readable form. Some fellow students were already using LaTeX by that point (mostly high energy physics, the slowest to graduate of the physics specialties) but I wasn't going to change my already obsolete tech stack within mere months of finishing. I also have my parents' chemistry theses. They took handwritten manuscripts to a typist who banged out 4 copies at once using carbon paper. And then they entered their equations and figures by hand. (My thesis is hand corrected too). And their theses were short. LaTeX did a lot of things for my fellow students, but it didn't make them finish quicker. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|