▲ | PaulHoule 17 hours ago | |||||||
I'll argue that if you want to fail at a cause just join it up with "the unicause" and you make failure certain. On the other hand you might think marginalization is moral superiority and you can win by failing, in which case the unicause is for you. I believed in the unicause in 1993 and had the good fortune to be told by black nationalists that they didn't want no honky to tell them what to do and it was the best thing that ever happened to me. | ||||||||
▲ | nis0s 17 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The idea of reparations is both a fascinating economic and social problem to think about. I personally think reparations at a group or nation state level are impractical and infeasible, but maybe someone could show a paper or two on how they could model the effect of such resource or money movement across nations and economies. I can’t even imagine the geopolitical consequences, but I think a lot of new nuclear nations are going to pop up. Climate change is real, but climate justice seems like a convenient excuse to make someone else pay for your country’s bad governance. What keeps many of these countries from building up from shanties like Singapore, or becoming small and mighty like Vietnam? How do they imagine that an influx of money will solve any of those problems which keep them from transforming at the moment? Iraq has 1100% more GDP since it was bombed after 9/11, but it still struggles with electricity and water supply issues. Lack of money and resources is not the problem for many of these nations, but their leaders and elites are excellent at convincing everyone otherwise. | ||||||||
|