▲ | IPv6 adoption just shy of 50%; 49.76% on 26th July(google.com) | |||||||
11 points by zeristor 16 hours ago | 5 comments | ||||||||
▲ | NAHWheatCracker 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
My ISP in a small rural town supported IPv6. I have a few personal projects that only have a public v6 address because I don't want to pay AWS for an v4 address. It worked fine for a year and a half after I moved in, then they did some work and suddenly no IPv6. At least I could enable 6to4 on my router, but that has intermittent issues. As someone who wishes IPv4 would just die, I wish I had options to push back on such nuisances. | ||||||||
▲ | bdd 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
IPv6 adoption visualizations from others: - Meta: https://www.facebook.com/ipv6/ - Akamai: https://www.akamai.com/security-research/ipv6-adoption-visua... - Cloudflare: https://radar.cloudflare.com/adoption-and-usage | ||||||||
▲ | AlgebraFox 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Reports say IPv6 is gaining market share. But most ISPs are delegating /64 prefix. This is as useless as carrier grade NAT. Atleast with IPv4, I can create NATed subnets for guests, IoT devices etc. That's not possible with IPv6. Overall it's a negative progress. Worse than IPv4+NAT. | ||||||||
▲ | paulddraper 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
What happens first? GTA 6 or GitHub IPv6 | ||||||||
|