Blown away by the traffic from this post!

For the web designers here please let me know if you noticed anything amiss. Ive had particular issues getting captchas working so please comment if you run into that issue.

Thanks for sharing your insight. Wouldn't hurt from a proofread. There are some typos / wrong words, that detract from the sense of authority lent by the article. Eg:

"It's clear that we this structure" --> with

"with out those protections in place" --> without

"Investors would be best to limit their exposer to losses beyond their investment" --> exposure

There might have been others, I had to go back and skim to summarize for you.

> For the web designers here please let me know if you noticed anything amiss.

The images some of the visuals do not show in reader view in Safari and Firefox. Other than that, the content is well laid out and very readable.

Very minor nit: "It's clear that we this structure,..."

Cool article, it's a clear explanation of something I never knew about.