|
| ▲ | recursive 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Didn't realize this was in a browser. That tells me all I need to know. |
| |
| ▲ | lioeters 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Coming soon: Suno Desktop (Electron version). "Look ma, no browser!" |
|
|
| ▲ | efskap 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's a pipe dream of course, but WebAssembly would be an ideal target for C++ VSTs for its portability and sandboxing |
|
| ▲ | polishdude20 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can get a vst to run locally and still work with the browser. |
| |
| ▲ | input_sh 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Okay, but why would you? What's the advantage of that? VSTs are resource hogs (when you have like 10+ running at once), not DAWs. I somehow doubt a full-blown browser connected to more than a couple of VSTs would be less of a resource hog than doing the same in a DAW. On your computer. That you own. In your house. Without like additional 50ms of latency for the data to travel to the server and back. | | |
| ▲ | recursive 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I just assumed all the audio data would be local even in a "browser DAW", so VST calls wouldn't go through a network. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | zahlman 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| ... VSTs are executable code? |
