> You seem...

No. You are 100% wrong.

The context of this discussion is PE. So comments discussing this involve PE. So while you are correct in general, you are wrong specifically.

In light of that, I stand by what I said: you have to explain how removing CON solves the PE issue mentioned when states without CON had the same issues.

Maybe this isn't possible, but then we accept that this is not an answer to PE, which again, topic of conversation.