Remix.run Logo
Abu Dhabi royal family to take stake in TikTok US(theguardian.com)
71 points by andsoitis 7 hours ago | 80 comments
karaterobot 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The ideal scenario isn't the government forcing a sale of TikTok for political reasons. The ideal is that people stop using TikTok because they realize it's not good for them, but I guess I don't see that happening. Instead we'll just continue scrolling while wondering why we're so unhappy and angry all the time.

nostrademons 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I had heard that the existing TikTok app will shut down in the U.S, with the investment consortium launching a new TikTok US app and re-training the algorithm on U.S. users only. If this is true, it might have the same effect: speedbumps where users have to download a new app and lose all their personalization often lead to massive drops in userbase, as they figure that if they have to start from scratch anyway, they might as well start from scratch doing something else.

dboreham 5 hours ago | parent [-]

They (Andressen et al) won't do it that way.

xnx 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> The ideal is that people stop using ______

Fill in the blank with whatever you find personally disagreeable: TikTok, alcohol, sports gambling, hallucinogens, video games, cigars, sugary foods, etc.

sentinelsignal 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Unfortunately you're right. Including the last part.

Rebuff5007 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

IMO the ideal is incredibly strong data privacy laws such that it does not matter if consumer products are owned by a rich guy in Mountain View or Abu Dhabi.

AdamN 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Privacy (a big issue) is the least of our problems with media ownership by hyper-elite royalty.

paxys 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The biggest benefactor here is Meta. There's no way TikTok will remain a dominant social platform in the US amidst all the political meddling and so many high profile investors with competing interests.

This is likely also why Meta announced that they are overhauling Instagram to make Reels and recommendations the default experience - https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/instagram-overhaul-app-num.... Just as with Threads, they saw an opening and are doubling down hard.

throwacct 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well, TikTok is and will still be the dominant force in that area, and I don't think Instagram will win this time. For photos? Instagram is still the king of the hill. For video consumption? TikTok is the king.

bamboozled 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We could be spending all this effort on curing diseases...how stupid we can be.

gretch 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You won't believe this next part. We actually did make vaccines for several diseases that were as close to 100% safe as real world possible, and people were voluntarily rejecting it.

sli an hour ago | parent [-]

Tiktok primarily causes harm and plenty of people voluntarily reject it. What's your point? We shouldn't do good things because sometimes people don't want them?

belter 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Larry Ellison is the richest person on Earth, and that tells you everything you need to know about the world, and Peter Thiel AntiChrist concerns...

tdeck 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Do not fall into the trap of anthropomorphizing Larry Ellison.

atmavatar 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Correction: richest lawnmower

baxtr 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> MGX, chaired by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, will take 15% stake, with social media firm valued at $14bn

So they value the most attention owing social media at a mere $14b? As reference: Meta has a total market cap of around $1.8 T.

xenobeb 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is so outrageous to value Tiktok USA at $14 billion.

Forget Meta's market cap, does anyone think Zuckerberg wouldn't have paid 20 billion for Tiktok USA ?

Just so corrupt and to even call it a sweetheart deal is outrageous.

I thought it should just be banned in the US. The idea we are basically strong arming a whole nation and stealing a company at a bullshit valuation is completely insane.

paxys 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"Sell to our preferred investors for pennies on the dollar or lose access to the most lucrative market in the world". It's not like TikTok had a choice.

jasonlotito 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

For what it's worth, this is just TikTok US, not TikTok as a whole. Make of that what you will.

pzo 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

still looks small if simplifying and counting just by global population would be 340/8100*1800 = ~$75B. Besides US market is more profitable.

jasonlotito 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Meta is more than just Facebook though.

> still looks small if simplifying and counting just by global population

Yes, I agree, if you ignore everything except one single number, I can see how it can be confusing.

prmoustache 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Are the US Tiktok infra, network and user feeds separated from the rest of the world?

jasonlotito 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes. This is fairly common knowledge.

sybercecurity 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's getting to the point where the news should be who isn't in on the deal.

potato3732842 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Gotta have enough parties in on it so that there's no one party responsible enough to face consequences when it all goes tits up.

tolerance 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is turning into a crude case study for multipolar geopolitics.

thevillagechief 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How and who is making the decisions about ownership? I'd think they'd have gone for open bidding, or even an IPO. I don't even see why negotiations with the Chinese was needed. There's a law, affirmed by the Supreme Court. The private markets could have handled this just fine. The Biden admin abrogated responsibility here by punting this.

loopdoend 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is a tool to control people they don't want to shut it down.

razster 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I only use TT for my 3D modeling, Blender3D tricks and motion graphics. I have all political options disabled and have blocked all news. So far not a single political ideology has popped up on my fyp. Ads are also 0. Enjoying it so far. Fine tuned for my needs.

tdeck 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I only use YouTube in a mobile browser with uBlock Origin turned on, so I never see any ads. Highly recommended by the way. Clearly YouTube is a terrible business model and has zero revenue potential.

bamboozled 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

and you are what, 0.5% of people that use it and do that?

burkaman 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Donald Trump and his friends are making the decisions. They have ignored the law you mentioned because they don't like it.

addicted 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For context, SNAP is valued at $14Bn.

This is a straight up giveaway to friends.

Even dictators in other countries don't make it so obvious because they're worried their populations would revolt, which says a lot about the American voter today.

mandeepj 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> This is a straight up giveaway to friends.

None of Tiktok's executives were present, and China has not confirmed the sale. So, I don't think clown's EO means anything. He's living in his own la la land :-)

throwawaymaths 6 hours ago | parent [-]

wait why does china have to confirm the sale? i thought tiktok was singaporean!

mandeepj 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> i thought tiktok was singaporean!

Tiktok's CEO is a singaporean! Maybe you are mixing it with that.

Tiktoks' parent company ByteDance is headquartered in China. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ByteDance

c0balt 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Shou Zi Chew, the CEO of TikTok since 2021, is Singaporean. TikTok, the company, is owned by ByteDance.

sjsdaiuasgdia 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The CEO of TikTok is from Singapore. Bytedance is a Chinese company.

maxglute 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

IIRC previous talk for TikTok US valuations / buyout was ~40B. But Tiktok was at ~20% Bytedance / PRC ownership before and after. US ownership to boost from 60-80%. So not really sure who this is boning more.

giarc 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's all a grift. The cynic in me says that if you looked close enough, you'd find some large deposits into Trump coin or World Liberty Finacial shortly before this announcement.

analog8374 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Tiktok is good for what, spying and propagandizing? I can see how all the rulers would want to buy in on that. Probably got some serious large scale magic analysis stuff going on.

It's heartwarming to see the ruling classes coming together for their mutual benefit like this.

fennecbutt 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Lmao "protecting American data" by handing it over the the UAE.

rswail 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Larry Ellison will own the data. It already is hosted on Oracle Cloud.

The data won't leave the US, the UAE are paying a protection tax.

sporkxrocket 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Larry Ellison is far more concerning:

https://www.ynetnews.com/article/5038379

Between them and a16z, this is Israel taking control of a channel they view as threatening as it gives Palestinians a voice.

endsandmeans 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

When the state picks the winners everyone loses.

Run it into the ground!

bgwalter 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If Larry Ellison overtly censors TikTok, teenagers will leave.

Do I understand that the strategy here is soft power so that teenagers get approved content via the algorithm in the hope that they don't notice? That is a pretty big gamble.

So they are dumping part of that risk on the gulf monarchies like with Twitter. I bet China is already working on a TikTok replacement.

ct0 5 hours ago | parent [-]

No they wont, teens everywhere still use IG, and YT.

SirFatty 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But hey, at least we've removed the China threat!

tru3_power 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Did we really though?

Calavar 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Gulf States are seeing absolutely excellent ROI for the 1b they pooled together for a 747.

shihab 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That was government of qatar, this is Abu Dhabi (UAE). They had a diplomatic crisis, with full-scale blockade not so long ago.

meibo 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's fine, I don't think he can tell the difference.

bgwalter 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

UAE was engaged in crypto dealings instead:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/15/us/politics/trump-uae-chi...

"Earlier this year, World Liberty, the crypto firm run by the Trumps and Witkoffs, announced an agreement with an investment firm backed by the ruling family of the U.A.E. The Emirati firm would conduct a $2 billion transaction using World Liberty’s digital coins, a deal that would provide a windfall to the Trump and Witkoff families."

tdeck 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I wish there were some clause in the US constitution that broadly and expressly prohibited this kind of thing.

bix6 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What does the UAE get out of this? Is it just a massive financial loss in exchange for US market access?

fib11235 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

One of NYT's recent podcasts (The Daily) covered this, basically the Biden administration was reluctant to give the UAE access to Nvidia chips because of their close dealings with China. 2 weeks after this crypto investment, the white house agrees to give the UAE access to the chips.

Here's an article if you're interested: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/15/us/politics/trump-uae-chi...

ceejayoz 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> What does the UAE get out of this?

What does the UAE gain by funneling $2B to Trump, who is notoriously a) transactional and b) one of the most powerful people on the planet?

alephnerd 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's the Emirate of Dubai, not Abu Dhabi.

oefrha 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You mean having their capital bombed with zero response from U.S.-supplied air defense systems is great ROI?

dboreham 5 hours ago | parent [-]

tbf they were attacked with albms and presumably the US didn't supply the space-based sensing part of the defenses.

pc86 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This comment shows an astounding lack of knowledge of not only current events but also even the most basic middle east geopolitics.

ceejayoz 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Wait until the intel from the bugs comes in!

FridayoLeary 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

OT but i think the 747 story deserves a bit more nuance. First of all to be clear i'm dismayed by the idea. It's not great optics that Trump wants to keep the plane (library force one?) . Even accepting it in the first place is also odd. Add to that, using it as Air Force One seems to be impractical.

BUT, there is precedent for this move. They gifted an even more expensive plane to Erdogan. From what i understand they have been trying to sell the plane for a while. It seems even they have trouble affording it's upkeep. Turns out there isn't a huge market for luxury private jumbo jets. From their perspective it's a white elephant. Trump is aware of that.

I heard another explanation that this is a way of putting lateral pressure on boeing. Trump is frustrated with the progress of the new air force one. His current one is aging. It makes sense as it's a typical tactic of his.

I'm not coming to defend it, just to explain some of the rationale behind the decision.

(edit to reply to several comments. First of all air force one is well maintained but it's old already. Parts and repairs become more difficult and the amount of miles left on the airframe can't be too high. Replacement is necessary. As to building a new plane out of spares being faster... Just ask boeing how that's going for them. They even had the fuselages ready and waiting for quite some time. Boeing executives know they will face some actual consequences for murdering the POTUS, which is probably why it's taking so long. It's difficult to build a plane properly when you've gotten rid of everyone who knows how and you've sold half of your factories, some to even more bad faith actors then yourself.)

ceejayoz 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> BUT, there is precedent for this move. They gifted an even more expensive plane to Erdogan.

"We gave a huge gift to an authoritarian leader" is indeed precedent; not a great one, though.

FridayoLeary 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Point is it looks less like a tribute you might offer to a powerful emperor and more like an ordinary plane giveaway.

ceejayoz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Are you… unfamiliar with Erdogan?

estearum 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What?

TheCondor 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

“Not great optics” is a very generous way to describe it. Maybe they should detail the faults of the current Air Force 1 and explain how it’s failing to enable the president to serve the nation. “Aging” is awfully vague and they service the hell out of those jets, completely rebuilding mechanical parts on an extremely aggressive schedule compared to airlines

flir 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> using it as Air Force One seems to be impractical

well... yeah. you'd have to strip it back to bare metal components and start again, wouldn't you? trust in every bit of electronics on the plane would be zero. be faster to build a new 747 out of spare parts.

estearum 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Even accepting it in the first place is also odd

illegal.

That's the word you're looking for. The Constitution is absolutely clear on this: POTUS is not allowed to accept foreign gifts without authorization of Congress. To this day, Trump has neither sought nor received Congressional authorization.

davidw 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is the emoluments clause:

    No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person
    holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent
    of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any
    kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.[5]
And the reason they put that there is the obvious one: this is as corrupt as corrupt gets.
dboreham 5 hours ago | parent [-]

More what you'd call "guidelines"...

davidw 5 hours ago | parent [-]

It's extremely clear. As is the cowardice and moral rot of the people in the majority in Congress and the Supreme Court who are supposed to be responsible for upholding the clear meaning of the Constitution.

kevin_thibedeau 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The gift was to the American people accepted on our behalf by the felon. It is public property that just needs to be declared inoperable when he is out of office so he can't use it illegally.

mandeepj 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> this is a way of putting lateral pressure on boeing

Their two 737 max planes crashes, killed 346 people. I think they are immune to any pressure at this point.

4ndrewl 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is it really a typical tactic of Trump or his administration. They don't come across as 4D chess player, more like make one move and they just tip over the table and say they won the game of checkers.

blitzar 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Congratulations to the US on taking soverign control over their TikTok feed.

kspacewalk2 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Congratulations to TikTok for avoiding being kicked out of the US market.

blitzar 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Technically they are kicked out of the US market. Their app, content and users siezed and handed to another party.

mikeodds 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Now let’s do LPs of famous American VCs