▲ | egberts1 3 hours ago | |
So Bluesky is attempting to avoid the evolutionary path into ? What I think they’re grappling with are: * Edge cases & slippery slopes: Distinguishing “fictional consent,” “fantasy” vs “non-consensual content,” especially in illustrated or animated work, is hard. * Automation risk: Letting AI auto-fill alt text or auto-censor content might introduce errors, overreach, or misinterpretation. * Creator confidence: If policies or enforcement are too strict or unpredictable, content creators (especially in adult / kink / erotic art spaces) may leave or self-censor. * Accessibility mandate vs burden: Encouraging alt text is good, but requiring it for every image adds friction; enforcing it strictly might deter visual content. * Policy signaling: How Bluesky frames its sexual content rules sends a message about what kinds of expression are welcome there (and what kinds are policed). Sounds like avoiding a cross betwedb 4chan and DeviantArt? |