The syntax kind of does mimic the rhythm of AI generated text but the ideas and flow appear original to me. I thought it was a good article and appreciate the points you make which I would not have otherwise known about.

I also think it bears pointing out that you chose not to refer readers to your podcast which is the exact opposite of what an AI bot would have done.

If the writing style exhibited here where each paragraph has a different variation of the GPT's "a but b" standby such as "It's a, but this time, b.", "Nothing says a like b." and "This isn't speculation, it's a, but b." really is your organic writing style going back to the 2010s, you should write an article about being the guy that naturally wrote in GPT voice, all the time, before GPT was a thing.

There is a huge profit opportunity in marketing yourself as a unique example for linguists to pin down and dissect.

> It’s not just an AI assistant anymore — it’s your new 24/7 digital roommate that “works for you overnight” to deliver personalized morning briefs.

"It's not just X, it's Y" is an obvious LLM sign. It doesn't read as natural English.

Deepseek was trained on ChatGPT outputs, so yes, their writing style is running throughout the post you claim to be the author of (I almost said your writing style, which it is not)

Share the original in Italian and your prompt. Because my suspicion is that you had a half baked idea and the LLMs did all the rest.