Remix.run Logo
tjpnz 13 hours ago

EU is #2 (behind the US) in terms of net sales accounting for 26% in 2024. There is no "or else".

0xDEAFBEAD 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I would think profits are more important than sales.

>...there’s evidence to believe the regulation is designed to extract from companies, rather than protect consumers: as we’ll see, the bloc often imposes massive, clearly premeditated fines immediately after compliance deadlines...

>...

>The fines permitted under both regulations are unprecedented; the DSA permits fines of up to 6% of a company’s global annual revenue, while the DMA permits fines of up to 10% of a company’s global annual revenue, and an egregious 20% for repeat offenses.

https://www.piratewires.com/p/eu-weaponizes-regulation-us-te...

The EU can write itself a check for up to 26% of Apple's annual revenue (6% + 20%). Coincidentally, that's the same as your 26% number for Apple net sales from the EU. But if Apple gets fined 26%, that represents a huge loss of capital since they still have to pay for COGS, pay taxes, pay employee salaries, and so forth.

10 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
theodric 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I would consider it incredibly unlikely to happen, but based on how much money they're banking, I'd say Apple could probably afford to live without the EU.

akmarinov 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That’ll go over well with investors.

“Hey, we’ve decided to cut 25% of our revenue”

The stock price would love it

hiatus 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For how long? Or at least, how long after they lose their second largest consumer market do shareholders demand a shakeup of leadership?

tjpnz 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Not with the declines they're seeing in China.