▲ | antononcube 12 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
What is better in Raku than Python? Did you use any of the dedicated Raku LLM packages? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | looking4advice 11 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I think Raku is better than Python agent based systems for a few reasons: - You don't have to think about concurrency or multithreading as in Python. There is no GIL to worry about. The built in support for things Supply and hyper-operators are all available in the language. It is really easy to hook up disparate parts of a distributed agent without having to think about async or actors libraries or whatever in Python. - Something I prefer is the OOP abstractions in Raku. They are much richer than Python. YMMV, depending on what you prefer. - Better support for gradual typing and constraints out of the box in Raku. Python wins on the AI ecosystem though :) I started messing around with this code several years ago and the LLM libs in Raku were not as rich as today. I thought I needed a specific type of LLM message handling structure that could be extended to do tool handling and some of Letta type memory management (which I never got around to!). I have some Python libs of my own and I ported them. I suspect if I was starting now, I would use what is available in the community. This version of TallMountain is the last of a long series of prototypes, so I never rewrote those parts. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|