| ▲ | monkeyelite 8 hours ago |
| That sounds like a separate concern than the one implied by the headline. |
|
| ▲ | text0404 8 hours ago | parent [-] |
| The headline of a news article is a way to draw the reader in. The subhead in this case was "A report from Senate Democrats says DOGE moved sensitive information to a cloud server despite the risk of 'catastrophic' impacts," with the lede (the first paragraph of the article) mentioning the lack of oversight. I can change the title if you'd prefer, but I believe that goes against HN guidelines. |
| |
| ▲ | monkeyelite 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The headline of a news article is a way to draw the reader in. Yes, I think that’s where the “bait” characterization comes from. | | |
| ▲ | text0404 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sure. Crappy headline. I was going to post the NYT one ("Democratic Report Says Disorder at DOGE Jeopardized Americans’ Data: Members of a Senate panel described a haphazard working and living environment that involved transferring sensitive information to servers 'without any verified security controls'") but it was paywalled. Less bait I suppose but it's still pretty damning. |
|
|
