Wasn't the only compiler that produced code worth anything for Itanium the paid one from Intel? I seem to recall complaining about it on the GCC lists.

▲

hajile 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

NOTHING produced good code for the original Itanium which is why they switched gears REALLY early on.

Intel first publicly mentioned Poulson all the way back in 2005 just FOUR years after the original chip was launched. Poulson was basically a traditional out-of-order CPU core that even had hyperthreading[0]. They knew really early on that the designs just weren't that good. This shouldn't have been a surprise to Intel as they'd already made a VLIW CPU in the 90s (i860) that failed spectacularly.

[0]https://www.realworldtech.com/poulson/

	▲	speed_spread 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Even the i860 found more usage as a specialized CPU than the Itanium. The original Nextcube had an optional video card that used an i860 dedicated to graphics.

▲

hawflakes 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I lost track of it but HP, as co-architects, had its own compiler team working on it. I think SGI also had efforts to target ia64 as well. But the EPIC (Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing) didn't really catch on. VLIW would need recompilation on each new chip but EPIC promised it would still run.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicitly_parallel_instructio...

	▲	nextos 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yes, SGI sold quite a lot of high-end IA-64 machines for HPCs, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SGI_Altix
	▲	fooker 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		In the compiler world, these HP compiler folks are leading compiler teams/orgs at ~all the tech companies now, while almost none of the Intel compiler people seem to be around.