That sounds like Apple's problem.

It is a lot my problem, because I actually do want those features…

I could not care less about interoperability or whatever the current trend of regulation tries to “fix,” I want the features, period.

▲

general1465 34 minutes ago | parent [-]

Apple made a decision to shoot itself in the foot and you are a collateral damage. Competitors are shipping those features without an issue. So it seems like the problem is not with regulations.

▲

frizlab 11 minutes ago | parent [-]

> Competitors are shipping those features without an issue.

Actually not the ones I care about (for instance idgaf about live translation).

> Apple made a decision to shoot itself in the foot and you are a collateral damage.

Also not really true. Apple has always been straightforward about what they were doing, and suddenly the EU decided it was not good. But I truly and wholeheartedly disagree, and I actively want iOS the way it was.

Let the market decide! As long as they do not deceive the users it’s ok/good, even, IMHO.

	▲	troupo a few seconds ago \| parent [-]
		> and suddenly the EU decided it was not good. There's nothing sudden > Let the market decide! How can the market decide when one of the duopoly players prevents others from competing? E.g. Pebble literally cannot compete with Apple Watch because Apple uses a completely unrelated product to cut them off from useful functionality https://ericmigi.com/blog/apple-restricts-pebble-from-being-...