for an example of a global risk that was mitigated without a world government, take a look at nuclear arms treaties like START, SALT, etc.

▲

marcus_holmes a day ago | parent | next [-]

And banning CFCs so the hole in the Ozone layer started healing. We don't need population control to reduce carbon emissions to reasonable levels (note we don't need to prevent all emission of carbon; that's not the goal)

	▲	blooalien 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> "note we don't need to prevent all emission of carbon" Yeah, we only need to cut back carbon emissions to the point that the Earth's natural carbon cycle systems can actually cope with it (and drastically cut back on the unchecked destruction and poisoning of Earth's natural coping systems in general while we're at it).

▲

Dig1t a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Well if you apply the approach used for nuclear to AI the result would be invasive and authoritarian. The United States largely polices other countries nuclear efforts, at least in its sphere of influence. If we allowed it to police computation in the same way it polices nuclear, the result would be a massive invasion of privacy and autonomy that would result in a system which would be easily abused.

There are people talking seriously about drone striking data centers which are running unapproved AI models.

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/be-willing-to-des...

	▲	marstall a day ago \| parent [-]
		well i'd suggest most countries are already regulating AI and will continue to do that with existing laws that protect privacy, the environment, worker safety, limit hate speech, etc. some of those regulations extend beyond national boundaries, like GDPR, etc. in the EU. I think the fearmongering around AI may be overblown by its investors and promoters, but to the extent that some models may morph what it means for a country to be militarily secure, there's no reason why diplomacy, negotiation and de-escalation won't be the same powerful tools they often have been in the very human drive to mitigate the risk of conflict ...