Your thesis in defense for-profit healthcare is that PE and capitalism are not the same thing, and are not 'at odds' with quality care?

You are asserting that these excess deaths and real harms due to these takeovers are not natural and expected consequences?

What is the secret third thing that makes these otherwise compatible systems 'at odds' with human life?

This take is also a little funny because people do often conflate "capitalism" and e.g. "markets", which certainly don't rely on capitalism. But "private equity" is about as tightly-bound to the concept of capitalism as you can imagine.