> I believe it also to be true that the IDF do not want to kill civilians, and that their target is only Hamas.

I think it’s this second assertion that relies on facts not in evidence. Previous Guardian reporting on IDF use of compute for targeting indicated they were using it to increase, not decrease, the number of approved targets.

▲

flumpcakes 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Quantity doesn't correlate with accuracy. OP's point was that surely having more intelligence means you are more accurate and thus less collateral damage.

	▲	roughly 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Again, prior reporting on the IDF’s computational efforts do not indicate that less collateral damage was a driver - quite the contrary, the algorithm was being used to pad out targeting lists: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/israel-gaza-ai... You’re describing what ought to be, not what currently is.
	▲	bArray 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Exactly. And an increase in accurate targets would lead to the faster removal of Hamas, and the process of repair can begin faster.

▲

jameshilliard 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Hamas is quite open about their desire to increase civilian casualties by deliberately using civilians as human shields(which is of course a war crime). It's clearly part of their overall strategy.

	▲	elcritch an hour ago \| parent [-]
		This shouldn’t be a controversial statement. It’s well documented that Hamas utilizes this strategy by their own statements. On the Israeli side it’s much harder to determine what tactics some (military) groups utilize.