▲ | emchammer 18 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God, I love this kind of hot take. It fills in the blanks that the website’s design leaves out. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | DarkNova6 18 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm not even being provocative, it's just the facts. If you want a hot take it would be that: The only reason the current management is still in place is because the CEO's husband is in politics and institutional investors want to keep their allies in place. In turn, Accenture keeps their friends happy by syphoning money from the bottom to the top, at the cost of their own consultancy and delivery capabilities. Meanwhile, the C-suit cashes out big-time. The CEO is fundamentally incapable of changing even a light bulb, let alone address strategic problems. As a lawyer and Harvard MBA, she provided "growth" by buying shitty IT-companies where key-experts left the company immediately. She doesn't have the knowledge or intellectual capability or create "value" or "operational efficiency". Instead, they chase trends and make one terrible decision after another. This burns money faster than a conveyor belt can transport into a furnace (like selling off most offices during covid at low prices and having to buy new ones when prices are up). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|