▲ | thw_9a83c 5 hours ago | |
> Symbian phones from early 2010's are more capable... I suppose there was no need to mention Symbian. It was a hellish system to develop for, and once smartphones had a little more RAM and CPU power, Symbian had absolutely no future. Nokia's answer to the iPhone was MeeGo [0], which wasn't bad, but Google's Android was, in fact, even better. | ||
▲ | aranelsurion 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> Google's Android was, in fact, even better. More like it was around three years earlier to the market, and already had a huge network of users, developers and apps. |