▲ | deskamess 2 days ago | |
So would the signed 'object' contain code? Or is it just data? And even if it is code, does deserializing mean execution? I guess it could mean execution at some other stage in the process. What is the end-goal of this... would it be data exfiltration vs ransomware. | ||
▲ | cogman10 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
Java object serialization can be super dangerous as it just works on any class that implements serializable. That means if the shape of your object is something like
You've created a class which an attacker can plug in any object which implements `SerializableFunction` into `bar`. That includes externally created functions!Here's an article detailing exactly how that works: https://www.baeldung.com/java-serialize-lambda | ||
▲ | cwsx a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
> What is the end-goal of this... would it be data exfiltration vs ransomware. The end-goal is to gain complete access to the system - the outcome (data theft or ransomware) is customers choice | ||
▲ | lyu07282 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It often results in remote code/command execution, its data that de-serializes into java objects. But during the instantiation or sometimes deconstruction of objects, code can be executed. Popular tool for java: https://github.com/frohoff/ysoserial |