▲ | microtonal a day ago | |
Wait what? We always knew Apple would be affected, though I think the holding back of features is also partially out of spite and to weaponize users against the EU. I am super happy with the DMA (and DSA) and have been an Apple user since 2007. Monopolies, duopolies, and oligopolies should be regulated by law. The law is above Apple. Apple should deal with it and stop whining like a spoiled child. For me the most egregious thing is when China asks to jump, Apple asks how high. When a democracies ask, they fight it tooth and nail and go full malicious compliance. tl;dr: yes, it's a shame we are missing out on some features, but protecting the rules established by democracies is more important than a bunch of features. | ||
▲ | ahartmetz 19 hours ago | parent [-] | |
>to weaponize users against the EU That is not going to work one bit. It's not that EU citizens love or even trust the EU government very far, but the pro-competitive legislation is something that pretty much everyone agrees with. |