▲ | uyzstvqs 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Yet I pick a Chromium based browser because Firefox is awfully anti-user. I still can't load extensions that are not Mozilla-approved, a major deal breaker for me. Then there's the "news" (ragebait slop) on the new tab screen by default, almost like I'm using MS Edge, and also the many sponsored & "suggested" (read: sponsored) links by default in new tab and the address bar as well. The only acceptable Gecko-based browser I know of right now is Zen, which is great but still in beta. And Tor & Mullvad Browser are good for private one-time sessions. We need competition for a free and open internet, I fully agree. Mozilla is far from a decent champion for that cause. I'm far more excited at what Ladybird has to offer. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | RamRodification an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Sponsor stuff that you can just turn off (Firefox) vs. Selling out your privacy directly (chromium with worse fingerprinting protection) and indirectly (Google browser monopoly). | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | prettymuchnoone 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
by "Mozilla approved" do you mean that it has to come from the official add-on store? because in my experience, it doesn't--I've installed a couple of extensions manually by just dragging the .xpi into the window. | |||||||||||||||||
|