Remix.run Logo
that_guy_iain 7 hours ago

> Even with un-googled Chromium I do not think these statements are self-consistent. We need browsers that do not allow Google to control the ecosystem. We need legitimate competition.

If you fork Chromium, Google doesn't control the ecosystem, it controls a large part of it. But you're able to build on top of that ecosystem. So you can have the best of both worlds, all the extensions and ecosystem from Chrome but with more. That is called true competition.

I also suspect Brave would take offense to your claim you can't have privacy on a Chromium fork.

acka 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

While I appreciate your perspective, the widespread adoption of Google Chrome has presented challenges. The implementation of Manifest V3 demonstrates Google's significant influence over extension developers, requiring adherence to increasingly restrictive APIs or facing limited visibility within less popular browsers.

that_guy_iain 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Extension developers are not forced to adhere to anything from Google to build compatible extensions that work on forks such as Brave. If they want to be in the Google ecosystem, sure, but as I pointed out, you can build your own ecosystem on top of it.

If you build on top of it, you're not forced and unable to extend the ecosystem.

5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]