> The only reasonable argument for any immigration is if it equally enriches all us citizens.

Name any economic policy that will equally enrich all citizens. That seems like a ridiculous bar to meet.

Immigration obviously dates back far, far before the 1960s. What in the world leads you to believe that it’s responsible for the current (admittedly massive) inequalities we face?

> What in the world leads you to believe that it’s responsible for the current (admittedly massive) inequalities we face?

It’s a symptom of the problem not the primary cause. Our real issue is elites that view us as cattle. Rulers that care about their people take a much more measured approach to immigration.

And yes, obviously pedantic equality is not achievable. I want more roads, trains, healthcare etc and less IPOs.