▲ | cactusplant7374 3 days ago | |||||||
> I'm not sure what you're trying to tell me here. I'm telling you that Firefox is going to be out of business soon because users favor ad blocking and blocking trackers. That is the trend. Firefox isn't growing anymore. > Honestly I have more questions looking at the Brave "transparency" report, as it seems to have more information about users than Firefox... Metrics can be transmitted without revealing the user. This is well known. You can't suggest anything. I am done with this conversation. | ||||||||
▲ | godelski 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Do you not think everyone saying Firefox is going to be out of business soon plays a role in this?Regardless, I think you've ignored the root of my argument. I'm not trying to be a Firefox fanboy here but it's not like there's many options. The playing field is Chrome, Firefox, Safari. So only one of these is not "big tech".
This is not well known and I think you've kinda "told on yourself" here. It is fairly well known in the privacy community that it is difficult to transmit user data without accidentally revealing other information. Here's a rather famous example[0,1]. I'd encourage you to read it and think carefully about how deanonymization might be possible after just reading a description of the datasets they deanonymize.
If you wish to disengage then that is your choice. I am really trying to engage with you faithfully here. I'm not even really attacking Brave here, as my critique is over the Chromium ecosystem. I think if you look at my points again you can see how they would dramatically shift if Brave were based off of Gecko or Webkit. Honestly, I would be encouraging Brave usage were it under those umbrella. Or even better, if it had its own engine! Because my point is about monopolization.[0] https://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.857/2018/project/Archie-Gers... | ||||||||
|