▲ | kelseyfrog 3 days ago | |||||||
Not just that, but it would presumably be sensitive to light emission spectra too. As inks can only reflect wavelengths of light that hit them, if the emission spectra has spikes or gaps - think LED or florescent - the reflected spectra will be a function of the light source[1]. Perhaps there's some accounting for this, and I'm curious to learn what it is, because it's a phenomenally complex problem. 1. You might think the sun is a standard source, but it's usually modulated by the atmosphere[2]. 2. Unless you are in space. | ||||||||
▲ | aDyslecticCrow 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> Perhaps there's some accounting for this, and I'm curious to learn what it is The slip itself is a calibration reference, so a clean photo of it could serve to compensate for the lamp and camera and calculate how accurate the readings is for different parts of the spectrum. (But good wide spectrum light would be ideal for high precision readout) You're also still limited to visible light because of the camera uv and ir filter, for which the sun is a decent reference. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | voidUpdate 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I don't think the sun is even a perfect source when you're in space, doesn't it have gaps in its emission spectra from the gasses that make it up? | ||||||||
|