I don't think it's the controversy of his guests so much as many of their unqualified ramblings that get treated as expertise. It's really obnoxious that it all gets put into political controversy when it's just often facially stupid BS.

▲

codr7 3 days ago | parent [-]

And you're enough of an expert on all subjects to judge?

Or are you rather shielding from whatever makes you think?

	▲	saghm 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		This is like Gell-Man Amnesia, but for the YouTube age. If I can recognize a source is unreliable for my area of expertise, it's more strange to expect that I would trust it in other areas just because I don't have the expertise in that area to directly evaluate all of the claims
	▲	freejazz 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The odd defensiveness of it wherever any criticism is labeled as some sort of philosophy against thinking. >And you're enough of an expert on all subjects to judge? Never claimed to be