> There isn't anything to learn about the event, other than humans gonna human.

US money wasn't supposed to be used to fund that kind of research. So people violated policy and evaded detection until the leak happened. How? Who? Would different audit controls have helped?

The was a cover-up after the fact. Again, how did it work and who was involved? What could have made it less effective?

The lab accident itself is the least interesting part, it's all the bureaucratic stuff that really matters. For boring generic bureaucratic-effectiveness reasons, not any "someone tried to do a bioweapon" silliness.