> Because that is a bold claim to make. There is no proof of a lab leak and evidence leads to the wet market as the source.

It was not a bold claim at the time. Not only was there no evidence that it was the wet market at the time, the joint probability of a bat coronavirus outbreak where there were few bat caves but where they were doing research on bat coronaviruses is pretty damning. Suppressing discussion of this very reasonable observation was beyond dumb.

> Suppressing discussion of this very reasonable observation was beyond dumb.

I thought it wasn't so much an error as a conflict of interest.