[flagged]

> This story is nonsense.

> It's just normal criminal enterprise for sending SMS spam and anonymous messages. Somebody used this service to send SMS threats to some politicians, so the Secret Service traced it back here. They are describing it as some special political threat ("35 mile radius from the UN") when it's just perfectly normal criminal enterprise.

> We know it's a crap story because to the way the New York Times story on this cites anonymous sources in the administration, and then James A. Lewis to confirm it. This guy, formerly of the CSIS think tank, is the the NYTimes regularly trots out to confirm cybersecurity claims by anonymous government officials.

> Ir's just normal crime folks, there's absolutely none of the threats here that they claim.

Why did you put quote marks around the word “legitimate”, like he said the word in his post?