Remix.run Logo
brokencode 11 hours ago

A direct line to threaten decision makers? Or to point out possible misinformation spreaders?

starik36 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Threaten. Because of the implication.

JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Because of the implication

What was the implication? Twitter had no business in front of the federal government. They were wilfully complying.

That doesn't make it okay. But it's a total retconning of actual history to suggest this was government censorship in any form.

dotnet00 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Musk owned Twitter for years of the Biden admin, at least one year of that was him openly simping for Trump.

So... what sort of threat was this, that suddenly disappeared when Musk bought it? How credible was the threat if Musk was able to release the Twitter Files without repercussions from the Biden admin?

brokencode 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Do you think Elon would ever shut up about it if he was getting threatened by Biden and the FBI?