I liked the article. I saw your PS that we added it to the working draft for c++26, we also made it part of OpenMP as of 5.0 I think. It’s sometimes a hardware atomic like on arm, but what made the case was that it’s common to implement it sub-optimally even on x86 or LL-SC architectures. Often the generic cas loop gets used, like in your lambda example, but it lacks an early cutout since you can ignore any input value that’s on the wrong side of the op by doing a cheap atomic read or just cutting out of the loop after the first failed CAS if the read back shows it can’t matter. Also can benefit from using slightly different memory orders than the default on architectures like ppc64. It’s a surprisingly useful op to support that way.

If this kind of thing floats your boat, you might be interested in the non-reading variants of these as well. Mostly for things like add, max, etc but some recent architectures actually offer alternate operations to skip the read-back. The paper calls them “atomic reduction operations” https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p31...

It's these kinds of posts that I appreciate reading the most, so thank you for sharing!

Great article! Did you end up hiring the candidate?!

Thank you for sharing, loved the article!

looks around room, heads nodding.

Ah, a magician. welcome.

“…no practical purpose” Nonsense, I learned something about compilation today. Thank you for sharing.

That info is included later in the article:

> PS: After conducting this journey I learned that C++26 adds fetch_max too!

One of the most practically important papers out there, I wish it were better known (but fortunately I think the "right" people know about it).

The term of art for this technique is "idiom recognition" and it's proper ancient, like, APL compilers did have some idiom recognition 50+ years ago.

An example you'll see in say a modern C compiler is that if you write the obvious loop to calculate how many bits are set in an int, the actual machine code on a brand new CPU should be a single population count instruction, C provides neither intrinsics (like Rust) not a dedicated "popcount" feature, so you can't write that but it's obviously what you want here and yup an optimising C compiler will do that.

However, LLVM is dealing with an IR generated by other compiler folk so I think it probably has less use for idiom recognition. Clang would do the recognition and lower to the same LLVM IR as Rust does for its intrinsic population count core::intrinsics::ctpop so the LLVM backend doesn't need to spot this. I might be wrong, but I think that's how it works.

That's a very good question. A proper compiler engineer would know, but I will do my best to find something and report back.

Edit: I could not find any pass with a pattern matching to replace CAS loops. The closest thing I could find is this pass: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/06fb26c3a4ede66755... I reckon one could write a similar pass to recognize CAS idioms, but its usefulness would be probably rather limited and not worth the effort/risks.

I checked Godbolt, with RISC-V instead of ARM since I'm more familiar with that, and it doesn't look like it.

https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/b5s4WjnTG

(amomax is the atomic fetch-max instruction. lr and sc are load-reserved and store-conditional instructions; sc is like a regular store except it only succeeds if the address was not modified since the previous lr that accessed it. IOW the assembly is basically one-to-one with the C source.)

That’s a neat trick, albeit with limited applicability given the very narrow range. Thanks for sharing!

Wasn't a culture fit

I expect candidates to suggest similar optimisations, but I felt it was unnecessary for the article itself.

> Note we did not ask rustc to optimize the code. If we did, the compiler would generate more efficient assembly: No spills to the stack, fewer jumps, no dispatch on memory ordering, etc. But I wanted to keep the output as close to the original IR as possible to make it easier to follow.

RTFA