They might be referring to Substack having a very open policy of having writers of any political (and other) affiliation on the platform, but I don't necessarily see it as a drawback to be so neutral.

▲

danpalmer 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Unfortunately there's no such thing as neutrality when it comes to intolerance, because intolerance is viral. I understand the desire to have neutral infrastructure or reporting agencies, but it's more complicated than that.

▲

brendoelfrendo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nazis. They allow Nazis on the platform. Platforming Nazis is not neutrality.

	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	th0ma5 an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		This. Sorry you're getting down votes at this moment for speaking the truth, but there really is no excuse for anti society anti intellectual illiberalism from the world's literal biggest losers.

▲

dyauspitr 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Neutral and Nazis don’t belong in the same sentence.

▲

pryce 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Might be the allegations such as those made by David Farrier this August[1]

> Then, last month, Substack sent out a push notification to some users of the Substack app encouraging them to subscribe to a Nazi newsletter. Like, full-Nazi stuff. Not subtle:

followed by a screenshot of a Substack profile full of swastikas describing itself as news for the "National Socialist and White Nationalist Community"

[1] https://www.webworm.co/webwormisleavingsubstack/