▲ | troupo 4 days ago | |||||||
Neither the protocol, nor the technologies it uses, nor the capabilities it exposes are new or even novel. What is novel is the "yolo vibe code protocol with complete disregard to any engineering practices, and not even reading at least something about that was there before". That is, it's world's first widely used vibe-coded protocol. That's why you have one-way protocols awkwardly wrapped to support two-way communication (are they on their third already?). That's why auth is an afterthought. That's why there's no timeout coordination. | ||||||||
▲ | electric_muse 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Agreed. I think most can agree that the protocol itself leaves a lot to be desired. But the idea itself is compelling: documentation + invocation in a bi-directional protocol. And enough real players have thrown their weight behind making this thing work that it probably some day will. I don't understand fully the "it's immature so it's worthy or ridicule" rationale so much. Don't most good things start out really rough around the edges? Why does MCP get so much disdain? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[deleted] |