> We're so helpless in the face of LLM technology that "having some victims, having some damages" (rather than reading what you submit to the court) is the inevitable price of progress in the legal profession?

Same with FSD at Tesla, there's many people who think that accidents and fatalities are "worth it" to get to the goal. And who cares if you, personally, disagree? They're comfortable that the risk to you of being hit by a Tesla that failed to react to you is an acceptable price of "the mission"/goal.