▲ | leakycap 8 hours ago | |||||||
If you're alive in '25 and worried about '22, I have bad news for you. > If you're peddling censorship disguised as safety, the only thing you deserve is a one-way ticket to obscurity, or a jail cell. Jailing people you don't agree with is certainly a take that puts you in excellent company. | ||||||||
▲ | infamouscow 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which effectively gutted the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act’s restrictions on domestic propaganda, was passed under a blue team controlled executive and senate. This wasn't a bipartisan effort—it was a deliberate move by the blue team to dismantle a post-WWII safeguard designed to prevent the U.S. government from targeting its own citizens with state-crafted narratives. The original act ensured the U.S. Information Agency’s output, like Voice of America, stayed outward-focused. The 2012 repeal, slipped into a defense spending bill and opened the door for domestic dissemination of government-produced content (read: propaganda). Why would a single party push this through? Draw your own conclusions, but the implications for information control are hard to ignore. Look at the timing: right as social media was becoming a primary news source. | ||||||||
|