|
| ▲ | Avshalom a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| The fundamental driver of the economy is people eating and clothing themselves, not writing memos that are never read. |
| |
| ▲ | tlb a day ago | parent [-] | | Food is 13% of US consumer spending, and clothing is 2.7%. Both have declined steadily since the industrial revolution. | | |
| ▲ | Avshalom a day ago | parent | next [-] | | I assure that people being alive is going to be the fundamental driver of the economy no matter what percent of consumer spending it is. | |
| ▲ | red_rech a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Now cut off people’s access to those and let’s see how the economy does |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dsr_ a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| ELIZA is that way ->. Try asking "what evidence supports your conclusions?". |
|
| ▲ | jennyholzer 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| years of consistent disappointment with the user experience, along with years of misleading internet propaganda dramatically overselling the quality and power of the underlying technology. it's a fucking dud. |
| |
| ▲ | seany62 a day ago | parent [-] | | It surprises me that people still believe this! I've seen AI deliver incredible value over the past year. I believe the application level is utilizing <.5% (probably less) of the total value that can be derived from current foundation models. | | |
| ▲ | keiferski a day ago | parent | next [-] | | It's only a niche weird opinion you'll find on forums like HN. In the real world, it's immensely useful to millions of people. It's possible for a thing to both be incredibly useful and overhyped at the same time. | |
| ▲ | dsr_ a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What evidence supports your conclusions? What evidence are you aware of that counters it? | |
| ▲ | jennyholzer a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Based on your gung ho attitude I suspect that you are personally invested in "AI products" or otherwise work for a firm that creates "AI products" |
|
|
