▲ | mcv 3 days ago | |
But it should exist. This is blatantly false advertising. Of course a jet fighter is a ridiculous thing to promise, but it's still a promise they chose to make. Why make a promise they never intend to keep? That sort of thing should be struck down hard by the courts. But a life time membership is not an unreasonable promise. | ||
▲ | db48x 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
People employ hyperbole all the time, so why can’t a company? But you’re right, a lifetime membership should really be for a lifetime. But since nobody is suing over it, then it’ll continue to be abused. |