Remix.run Logo
bluefirebrand 15 hours ago

Do you think that talking about overthrowing the legitimately elected government should not qualify as "terrorist threat"?

whoamii 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As long as we consider the Jan 6 rioters terrorists as well, I’m good.

amanaplanacanal 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They were just picnickers out having a good time. I guess.

bluefirebrand 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm fine with that, in case you think this was some kinda gotcha

navane 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Jan 6 happened and is pardoned. "Overthrowing the government" is just talk.

Shifting the focus on that talk is rethoric, this talk is unimportant and inconsequential compared to Jan 6.

ModernMech 35 minutes ago | parent [-]

I believe the phrase they used to describe J6 was "legitimate political discourse" https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/us/politics/republicans-j...

k33n 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

ternaryoperator 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Terrorism generally has specific elements; violence done against civilians for political or religious ends. So the Oklahoma City bombing would be terrorism, but the mass shooting in Las Vegas would not be. Unless calling for the overthrow of the govt includes a call to violence against civilians, it would not fit the traditional definition of terrorism.

lostlogin 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Is violent language terrorism? Most definitions seem to include physical violence. But not all.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_terrorism

lostlogin 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So how would that compare with Trumps crowd storming the capitol?

That was apparently fine, but antifa calling for it (if that even happened) is terrorism?

Politicians call for governments to resign/quit etc on a regular basis. Happened here in New Zealand last week.