This criticism 'proves too much', as the same critique can be made of taxes, which doesn't seem like your intent, unless you believe that prisoners are just the 'tip of the iceberg' when it comes to state-slavery.

▲

citizenpaul 15 hours ago | parent [-]

This is not rehabilitation. Its a politics long con to get free state money. Anytime someone has no rights and is getting money it goes to their captors. There is no exception. This guy in the link should be on probation at the very least.

Also this headline is yellow AF. "Prisoners are thriving" oh yeah? "THRIVING" In f-ing prison? I bet if you asked them 100% would rather not be doing their full time job in prison. I'd stake my life on it in fact.

	▲	johnnyanmac 13 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		>This is not rehabilitation. Its a politics long con to get free state money. 1) it can be both 2) I don't see the economic value here. If a prisoner software engineer can make 80k and can instead make 200k if they weren't in prison, what would make the state more? the garnished wages on a prisoner that need to partially go into maintaining the prison, or the taxes on the free person who's paying their own bills? (this isn't rhetorical, I think it's closer than what first blush tells us). > "Prisoners are thriving" oh yeah? "THRIVING" In f-ing prison?] Given the context of the article, I take "thriving" as in "being rehabilitated". Which should be the goal of the justice system, but it's been clear that is almost never is the result. If there's anyone wrongfully imprisoned or otherwise having the book thrown at them, that's a different matter.
	▲	daedrdev 14 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The choice is make 90% of their pay only if they make a lot, setting up a career that might be doomed to a life of crime, or do nothing all day in a cell. They also have to volunteer, what are you even saying